VRA Weekly Update: Market Update. Texas Election Lawsuit and Shocking Findings.
/VRA Market Update
Our extreme overbought on steroids market finally took a breather this week, led lower by the semis (SMH down another -.9% today). The internals held up well but we would not be adding to new broad market positions here. Dow -45 with nasdaq down a bigger 59 points (-.48%). Our wall of worry move higher is now being interrupted by fears of additional CV insanity lockdowns, serious vaccine concerns and the lack of new stimulus, not to mention whats happening with this fraud of an election. Trump is not going quietly into the night…and why would he.
Just 7 weeks ago, Twitter began shutting down any/all discussion of the Biden Crime Family. Massive election interference from our MSM and social media, in coordination with the Biden campaign. Now, when they think the coast is clear, it’s announced that Hunter Biden has been under federal investigation for at least two years for tax and money laundering fraud. Our Justice Dept and FBI, in on the scam as well. They know that we know…and they couldn’t care less. After hounding Trump in every way imaginable for 4 years, they tell us that it would have been against protocol to announce their ongoing investigation into the Bidens, for fear of impacting the outcome of the election.
You’ll want to follow Robert Barnes for the latest on the legal side of the 2020 election. Barnes makes the point clear; the Texas suit…now joined by 17 other states…relies on the same merits as the 2000 Bush-Gore Supreme Court case. States that allowed their elections to be rigged have disenfranchised states that played by the rules. Unless this fraud is corrected our elections won’t based on vote counting but on vote rigging.
American Thinker is out with the best cliff notes version of the Texas elections lawsuit that we’ve seen. Broken down by state (PA, GA, MI and WI), this piece presents the facts and evidence of fraud in these 4 key swing states.
My favorites:
- In PA, on the day before the election the state had sent out 2.7 million mail-in ballots. By the day after the election that number somehow grew to 3.1 million ballots, an increase of 400,000 ballots. Not included, and unknowable without further inspection, is the number of votes cast for Biden or Trump. I think its safe to assume 90% went to Biden. Vote rigging matters in PA rather than vote counting.
-In MI…and this is shocking to anyone with just an ounce of common sense and decency…174,000 ballots had no valid registration number, indicating the ballots were simply re-run multiple times. Again, common sense tells us 90% + of these votes went to Biden.
-In WI, 100,000 ballots just happened to be “found” after the election was over. The 90% Biden rule applies here as well.
Here are the shocking highlights, with link below.
Texas claims that the violations of election law in these states created an environment where ballot fraud was enabled and likely to occur. The lawsuit lists the violations of law in each of the defendant states and provides evidence of fraud (the number of ballots handled unconstitutionally) in each of the states sufficient to change the outcome of the ballot counts.
Pennsylvania
Evidence of Fraud:
Ballots with no mailed date: 9,005 (no evidence they were sent to a voter)
Ballots returned on or before the mailed date: 58,221
Ballots returned one day after the mailed date: 51,200 (Perhaps not impossible, but highly unlikely for the average voter to receive a ballot, fill it out, place it in the mail and have it returned the next day.)
On Nov 2, the day before the election, PA reports that 2.7 million ballots had been sent out. On Nov 4 that number had increased to 3.1 million — an increase of 400,000 mail-in ballots at election time with literally no reasonable chance of them being used by legitimate voters.
Georgia
Evidence of Fraud:
Mail-in ballot rejection rate for missing or inaccurate information or for non-matching signatures decreased from 6.42% in 2016 to .36% in 2020. Rejecting 2020 ballots at the same rate as 2016 would have resulted in a net gain of 25,587 votes for Trump — twice the number needed to overcome Biden’s count. With a six-fold increase in the number of mail-in ballots, reason would indicate that the rejection rate would increase, or at least stay the same, with so many first-time mail-in ballots.
Michigan
Evidence of Fraud:
174,384 mail-in ballots in Wayne County had no valid registration number, indicating they likely resulted from election workers running the same ballots through the tabulator multiple times.
71% of Wayne County Absent Voter Counting Boards were unbalanced, where the number of people who checked in did not match the number of ballots cast.
Wisconsin
Evidence of Fraud:
One hundred thousand ballots were supposedly missing and directed to be “found” after election day.
Conclusion
Significant violations of election law that were put into place to protect against election fraud is sufficient to invalidate the results of the elections, apart from whatever evidence is able to be gathered in a short time to show actual numbers of fraudulent ballots. Reason would indicate that there is a high number of fraudulent ballots that are impossible to identify, which is why the election laws pertaining to mail-in ballots were established to begin with.
There is no remedy to correct the Nov 3rd election because ballots that did not adhere to election law cannot be identified as separate from those that did. An accurate count of legal ballots that were cast cannot be made. Therefore, as directed in the Constitution, it falls to the legislature of each state to choose electors as has been done in the past. Failing that, each state may determine not to submit any presidential electors.
The Texas lawsuit claims the odds of Biden overcoming Trump’s lead and winning any of the states after the point indicated was one in a quadrillion. And therefore, the odds of winning all four was one in a quadrillion to the fourth power. The lawsuit did not provide information on how that number was determined. This may seem an exaggerated to some. It is enough to state that the odds of winning any one of the states was highly unlikely and the odds of winning all four were extremely unlikely. For example, if the odds of winning any one of the states was numerically much less extreme but still highly unlikely, say something like one in twenty, then the odds of doing that in all four states would be 1 in 160,000. Twenty beans in a jar: 19 white and 1 black. Reach in without looking and be lucky enough to pull out the one black bean. Chances of doing that again is 1 in 400. Clearly indicative of cheating if someone claims to have done that four times in a row. As I said the statistical analysis behind the claim of odds of 1 in a 1,000,000,000,000 are not given so I cannot speak to that. But even if the odds were orders of magnitude better than that, they were still astronomically small. At any rate, the merits of the lawsuit do not depend on any certain level of odds of Biden overcoming a lead that had been established by 3:00 A.M. the day after election.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/12/a_summary_of_texas_election_lawsuit_.html
Until next time, thanks again for reading…
Kip
Since 2014 the VRA Portfolio has net profits of more than 2300% and we have beaten the S&P 500 in 15/17 years.
Join us for two free weeks at VRAInsider.com
Sign up to join us for our daily VRA Investing System podcast
Also, Find us on Twitter
